Game Studio
Blog
Team Lysto
The veteran game developers know that playtesting is a must use process that bridges the gap between a developer's tunnel vision and the player's experience. It involves evaluating a game by observing real players interact with it, providing insights that can refine gameplay, fix bugs, and enhance overall enjoyment. Two primary methodologies dominate playtesting: quantitative and qualitative playtesting. Although for the dyslexic these terms may seem like the same word, understanding the differences between these approaches and knowing when to employ each can significantly impact the success of your game.
Quantitative Playtesting: The Numbers Behind the Game
Quantitative playtesting focuses on collecting numerical data that can be measured, compared, and analyzed statistically. This method involves tracking specific metrics such as completion times, success rates, frequency of actions, and other measurable behaviors within the game.
Key Characteristics
Objective Data: Relies on hard numbers and statistics.
Large Sample Sizes: Often involves many participants to ensure data reliability.
Statistical Analysis: Uses mathematical tools to interpret data.
When to Use Quantitative Playtesting
Identifying Patterns and Trends: If you need to understand how players interact with your game on a large scale, quantitative data can reveal patterns that individual observations might miss.
Benchmarking Performance: When setting or assessing performance metrics like level completion rates or average time spent in-game.
Testing Specific Hypotheses: If you want to know whether changing a variable affects player behavior statistically, quantitative methods are appropriate.
Examples of Quantitative Metrics
Level Completion Rate: Percentage of players who finish a level.
Death Count: Average number of times players fail or die.
Item Usage Frequency: How often certain items or abilities are used.
Session Length: Average time players spend in a single session.
Methods of Collecting Qualitative Data at Lysto
Surveys: Conducting surveys with Lysto enables you to rapidly collect large-scale data on topics related to your game, achieving statistically significant participation levels to provide near-certain insights.
A/B Testing: Running an A/B test to see if changing a gaming variable affects player behavior statistically.
Qualitative Playtesting: The Story Behind the Game
Qualitative playtesting delves into the subjective experiences of players. It seeks to understand the why behind player behaviors by gathering non-numerical data through observations, interviews, and open-ended feedback.
Key Characteristics
Subjective Insights: Focuses on player feelings, thoughts, and motivations.
Detailed Feedback: Provides context to player actions and preferences.
Smaller Sample Sizes: Often involves fewer participants due to the depth of data collected.
When to Use Qualitative Playtesting
Exploring Player Emotions: To understand how players feel about certain aspects of the game, such as story, graphics, or mechanics.
Identifying Unseen Issues: When you suspect there are problems not apparent through metrics alone, like confusion over controls or narrative elements.
Gathering Creative Feedback: To receive suggestions and ideas that could enhance the game in ways you hadn't considered.
Methods of Collecting Qualitative Data at Lysto
Player Interviews: One-on-one conversations to delve deeper into player experiences.
Playtest Sessions: Watching players as they interact with the game, noting behaviors and reactions.
Open-ended Surveys: Questionnaires that allow players to express thoughts in their own words.
Comparing Quantitative and Qualitative Playtesting
Understanding the differences between quantitative and qualitative playtesting is crucial for deciding which method to use at various stages of game development.
The Data
Quantitative: Objective, numerical, and can be statistically analyzed.
Qualitative: Subjective, descriptive, and provides context to behaviors.
Sample Size
Quantitative: Requires a large number of participants for statistical significance.
Qualitative: Is almost always more effective with a smaller, focused group.
Outcome Focus
Quantitative: Answers questions like "What is happening?" or "How often does this occur?"
Qualitative: Answers questions like "Why is this happening?" or "How do players feel about this?"
Choosing the Right Method for Your Research Needs
Selecting between quantitative and qualitative playtesting depends on your current development goals, resources, and the specific questions you need to answer.
Use Quantitative Playtesting When:
Measuring Specific Metrics: You need hard data on player behaviors, such as how long it takes to complete a level or how frequently a feature is used.
Testing Hypotheses: You're examining whether a change leads to a statistically significant difference in player behavior.
Scaling Feedback: You require input from a broad audience to ensure data reliability and generalizability.
Use Qualitative Playtesting When:
Understanding Player Experience: You want to know how players perceive the game, including their emotions and motivations.
Exploring New Ideas: You're in the early stages of development and need creative input to shape the game's direction.
Identifying Hidden Issues: You suspect there are problems that metrics alone aren't revealing, such as confusion over game mechanics or dissatisfaction with the storyline.
Integrating Both Methods for Optimal Results
While quantitative and qualitative playtesting have distinct differences, they are most powerful when used together. Combining both approaches provides a comprehensive understanding of player interactions with your game.
Step-by-Step Integration
Start with Qualitative Playtesting and then use initial feedback to identify potential issues and areas of interest. After that, follow up with Quantitative Playtesting and measure the prevalence and impact of these issues across a larger player base.
Simultaneous Data Collection
While players engage with the game, collect both numerical data and observe their behaviors and reactions.
Iterative Development
Use qualitative insights to inform changes, then apply quantitative methods to test the effectiveness of those changes, repeating the cycle as needed.
When to Choose Which Method
Early Development and Prototyping
Use Qualitative Playtesting: At this stage, you're exploring concepts and need detailed feedback on gameplay mechanics and player enjoyment.
Balancing Gameplay
Use Quantitative Playtesting: Collect data on player performance to adjust difficulty levels, ensuring the game is neither too hard nor too easy.
Post-Launch Updates
Use Both Methods: Gather quantitative data on how new features are used and collect qualitative feedback to understand player satisfaction and areas for improvement.
Conclusion
Understanding the differences between quantitative and qualitative playtesting—and knowing when to use each—is vital for any game developer aiming to create a successful game. Quantitative playtesting provides the hard data needed to identify trends and measure performance, while qualitative playtesting offers deep insights into player experiences and motivations.
By thoughtfully choosing the appropriate method for your specific needs—or by integrating both—you can gather comprehensive feedback that informs your development process, leading to a more refined and engaging game.
Comments
